News of Osama’s death have spurned an amazingly diverse range of emotions, responses and conspiracies. Robert Fisk suggests that Osama was betrayed, and Pakistan knew where he was hiding for a long time. There has been flag waving, jubilation, criticism, shoulder shrugging and quoting/mis-quoting Martin Luther King. The death of one person has not seen such celebrations since Hannibal poisoned himself sometime between 183-81 BC to avoid falling captive to the Romans. This, just as Superman wrestles with inner turmoil about the meaning of truth, justice and the American way and thinks about renouncing US citizenship.
Sites around the Internet are asking whether Osama should have been put on trial. The Economist is asking whether it is right to celebrate his death. Groups of friends, colleagues and family members are asking each other these same questions and having heated debates. These are deeply philosophical, moral and ethical questions to ask, and it is not as simple as ‘Yes’ or ‘No’.
Amid these discussion and events sits the International Criminal Court. Disinterested. Unused. Silent. What is the purpose of the ICC, of an international system of justice, of the very notion of justice itself, if the right to a fair trial is not given to all? Where extrajudicial killings by intelligence agencies, accountable to who(?), become judge, jury and executioner.
“In the prospect of an international criminal court lies the promise of universal justice. That is the simple and soaring hope of this vision. We are close to its realization. We will do our part to see it through till the end. We ask you . . . to do yours in our struggle to ensure that no ruler, no State, no junta and no army anywhere can abuse human rights with impunity. Only then will the innocents of distant wars and conflicts know that they, too, may sleep under the cover of justice; that they, too, have rights, and that those who violate those rights will be punished.” (Kofi Annan, former United Nations Secretary-General)
Geoffrey Robertson, an Australian QC and human rights lawyer, on the killing of Osama bin Laden states that ”It’s not justice. It’s a perversion of the term. Justice means taking someone to court, finding them guilty upon evidence and sentencing them”. Or, as Thrasymachus suggests (via The Economist), “Justice is nothing other than the advantage of the stronger…And they declare what they have made — what is to their own advantage — to be just for their subjects…. This, then, is what I say justice is, the same in all cities, the advantage of the established regime.”
Lest we forget those who died on September 11, 2001, but lest we also forget the hundreds of thousands of civilians killed in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan since September 11, 2001. We know how many Americans died on that day. We have no idea how many people have died in these countries since that day. Only their families know.
- Civilian deaths in Iraq: estimates vary, but reported to be as high 650,000
- Civilian deaths in Afghanistan: casualties of American air strikes, between 1,200-8,000. Estimated that over 20,000 have died as an indirect result of the invasion. The latest were 9 Afghan boys on March 7th, 2011.
“‘Truth, justice and the American way’ – it’s not enough anymore.” (Superman)
Update 17th May 2011
Superman has decided to retain his U.S citizenship, and give the country a second chance.
Latest posts by Brendan Rigby (see all)
- The TL;DR of global development concepts and practice - February 12, 2014
- Downton Abbey goes to Africa - January 23, 2014
This work, unless otherwise expressly stated, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.